Dispersed Work Hubs
Travel to work is a big environmental and social issue.
Working close to home has numerous benefits. This
suggestion is related to Melbourne but would have
application in a lot of cities around the world. The
suggestion was originally posted on the Future Melbourne
2026 website in February 2016.
Propose that offices be set up around Melbourne City in
the suburbs. These offices would be available for workers
and companies to use instead of commuting to City. Ideally
these would be within a couple of kilometres (or a few
more) of where the worker lives. The work hubs would be
set up by private companies and be available for a number
of other companies and public service organisations to use
at the one time, with desk space being rented. Ideally
there would be multiple people from the one company /
organisation in the work hub - so there would be checks on
attendance and to also satisfy the social aspects of work,
even though the worker's immediate boss and co-workers may
not be in physical attendance. Communications with bosses
and colleagues would be via Skype type face to face
teleconferencing at the desk as well as voice and text -
and the occasional visit to head office. These days most
office work is done on computers and with more and more
cloud based computing access to the systems and data used
for every day work should not be difficult to arrange. All
the technology for this is available now or if not will
certainly become commonplace over the next ten years (by
2026).
These dispersed work hubs would need to be started by
large organisation(s). Probably big public service
organisations may be less risk adverse. Big insurance
organisations might find this model workable with a large
number of people answering telephones queries from the
public who don't really all need to be in the one central
office provided they have the IT systems available. If it
was shown to be successful more, and more diverse,
organisations would jump on board. They need to be big as
it would be ideal to have at least five people -
preferably more - at the hub. For example they could have
a hub at Moonee Ponds (a middle suburb of Melbourne) close
to the rail station - so transport to HO would be
available. If a company had say 20 people working out that
side of town, close to Moonee Ponds, they might set up
their own office. If a smaller, as suggested, shared
private offices with rented desks may be a good option -
which would provide greater flexibility.
It would also be viable for places like Werribee (an outer
suburb of Melbourne), which has significant peak period
transport congestion on road and rail to Melbourne City
CBD. While I am sure Wyndham City
Council (of which Werribee is the main centre) would
like to attract the head offices of businesses (and will
do so for some), these suggested dispersed work hubs may
be suitable for a business that still wants to have their
head office based in the City, and it would have
advantages for their employees (convenience, travel time
and cost) and the businesses (lower office rentals and
potentially more staffing being available and happier
staff). The time of a business having to have all their
employees in the same place has passed.
This suggestion is an alternative/compromise to the
sometimes touted working from home telecommuting
which largely addresses the main perceived problems of
attendance to work (that is slacking off) and the possible
social isolation of home based work. I have also
discovered a similar arrangement operating in some parts
of the world known as co-working.
It seems to be used by groups of like minded individuals
getting together in a work place rather than companies.)
Contents Page.
|